Thursday, September 30, 2010
Glenbow again!
Tonight I spent all evening in Glenbow. The power was off when I first arrived in that community so it gave a new meaning to door-kocking. Thanks to everyone who spoke with me. The only new issue raised this evening was with respect to communciation. Several citizens hope that communciation between the Town and citizens will improve.
September 28-29, 2010
For two days I canvassed Glenbow during the day and the East End at night. It will take me three more days to finish these areas, and I am enjoying the good weather and friendly people.
In Glenbow, people's interests in the election ranged from dissatisfaction with decision making by the past council with respect to the brand and council pay hikes, to unhappiness with the current RV Bylaw, to growth management and taxation policy. People did not understand the difference between tax increases and user fee increases or how these decisions are made as it all seems arbitrary. For example, what were the increased costs associated with delivery of potable water that necessitated the user fee increase in water rates? I was asked, if elected, to keep taxes as low as possible-a big task to be sure, given all the infrastructure and facilities we need.
In the East End, the pathway connector is a big issue due to the uncertainty of when CPR will allow construction, as location as been decided. There is some issue with respect to "whistle blowing policy" that is being resolved. I was able to let folks know the process that the Cochrane Settlement Community Association engaged in with the Town and residents to ensure everyone could live with what the council was proposing. Some people think I am personally against the pathway connector and that is balderdash-I was opposed to the connector being built without community consultation with residents who may be directly affected. A line on a map is not public consultation-it is confusing and misleading to draw a line on the map and not explain what is being proposed. Now that consultation is being addressed, I am satisfied that process will be followed through. As well, as a note, the community association was also able to ask the town to extend the connector pathway west along the south of the tracks so that East End residents could go to Safeway, the Library etc. This is an added bonus in my view, and work done by the community, not the council. I am discovering purposefully planted misinformation about me and my motivations on a number of issues, which is saddening to me, but there is little I can do except continue my door to door campaign with integrity.
Last night, the lack of public consultation on the brand was the topic of discussion in the East End, as well as the Town's failure to keep the sidewalks user friendly for seniors at the Big Hill Lodge. It seems that the lack of sidewalks on Baird is a big problem as people walk down the streets and speeding is a problem, meaning people fear for their safety.
In Glenbow, citizens were concerned that the Town does not control the beavers which means that mature poplars are disappearing at an alarming rate along the Big Hill Creek. CEAC engaged the Canada World Youth to help a subcommittee put wire mesh around some poplars last year, but that program is not being continued by parks. People are frustrated that natural areas are not being maintained by our parks staff.
Two younger voters do not support Walmart in the downtown core-they believe that Walmart will wipe out the local shops in the downtown core-they both stated that they shop locally and support the local economy and wish the Town would do the same. From our youth, this was hopeful to me. One man suggested that we review the entire RFP process to ensure that local contractors can compete for town projects. His words, "what is wrong with the Town's RFPs: local contractors are not able to compete". He talked about the business licensing aspect that requires small businesses such as piano teachers to have licenses to teach 3 students in their homes, and whether this is discouraging these enterprises due to hefty fees. This bylaw should be reviewed, as should all of the town's bylaws to ensure they are still reflective of community values.
Thanks you to all of you who have taken time to talk to me about your issues and concerns. I will be out and about in Bow Ridge tonight and tomorrow, and Gleneagles over the weekend. Hope to see you on one of my walks. September is almost over-only 18 days to election.
In Glenbow, people's interests in the election ranged from dissatisfaction with decision making by the past council with respect to the brand and council pay hikes, to unhappiness with the current RV Bylaw, to growth management and taxation policy. People did not understand the difference between tax increases and user fee increases or how these decisions are made as it all seems arbitrary. For example, what were the increased costs associated with delivery of potable water that necessitated the user fee increase in water rates? I was asked, if elected, to keep taxes as low as possible-a big task to be sure, given all the infrastructure and facilities we need.
In the East End, the pathway connector is a big issue due to the uncertainty of when CPR will allow construction, as location as been decided. There is some issue with respect to "whistle blowing policy" that is being resolved. I was able to let folks know the process that the Cochrane Settlement Community Association engaged in with the Town and residents to ensure everyone could live with what the council was proposing. Some people think I am personally against the pathway connector and that is balderdash-I was opposed to the connector being built without community consultation with residents who may be directly affected. A line on a map is not public consultation-it is confusing and misleading to draw a line on the map and not explain what is being proposed. Now that consultation is being addressed, I am satisfied that process will be followed through. As well, as a note, the community association was also able to ask the town to extend the connector pathway west along the south of the tracks so that East End residents could go to Safeway, the Library etc. This is an added bonus in my view, and work done by the community, not the council. I am discovering purposefully planted misinformation about me and my motivations on a number of issues, which is saddening to me, but there is little I can do except continue my door to door campaign with integrity.
Last night, the lack of public consultation on the brand was the topic of discussion in the East End, as well as the Town's failure to keep the sidewalks user friendly for seniors at the Big Hill Lodge. It seems that the lack of sidewalks on Baird is a big problem as people walk down the streets and speeding is a problem, meaning people fear for their safety.
In Glenbow, citizens were concerned that the Town does not control the beavers which means that mature poplars are disappearing at an alarming rate along the Big Hill Creek. CEAC engaged the Canada World Youth to help a subcommittee put wire mesh around some poplars last year, but that program is not being continued by parks. People are frustrated that natural areas are not being maintained by our parks staff.
Two younger voters do not support Walmart in the downtown core-they believe that Walmart will wipe out the local shops in the downtown core-they both stated that they shop locally and support the local economy and wish the Town would do the same. From our youth, this was hopeful to me. One man suggested that we review the entire RFP process to ensure that local contractors can compete for town projects. His words, "what is wrong with the Town's RFPs: local contractors are not able to compete". He talked about the business licensing aspect that requires small businesses such as piano teachers to have licenses to teach 3 students in their homes, and whether this is discouraging these enterprises due to hefty fees. This bylaw should be reviewed, as should all of the town's bylaws to ensure they are still reflective of community values.
Thanks you to all of you who have taken time to talk to me about your issues and concerns. I will be out and about in Bow Ridge tonight and tomorrow, and Gleneagles over the weekend. Hope to see you on one of my walks. September is almost over-only 18 days to election.
Monday, September 27, 2010
September 27, 2010-West Valley
Tonight I was in West Valley and heard a lot about traffic and noise caused by trucks on Highway 22 and the CPR trains. Apparently, trucks on Highway 22 are using jake breaks at all hours of the day and night when they approach the Quigley Drive intersection. This could be dealt with through signage and bylaw enforcement. The West Valley community may require sound attenuation fencing or berms soon if the traffic noise continues to increase. It is very noisy to stand there and listen to the highway noise. When a train went by, we could not talk when standing outside.
I also heard quite a bit about how unhappy some folks are with the brand and how the decision was made to change our Men of Vision "Discover the Natural West" logo. I was interested that two different families said they would agree to pay to have the old brand re-instated, even though so much money has already been wasted to change everything over. We talked a lot about how the change has affected feelings of trust for the current councillors who went against public opinion to push the new brand through. Others are unhappy with the brand, but agree that we could live with it for a few years and then review the whole process when the Sustainability Plan comes up for review. If the new brand has not worked to attract new businesses to this community as the council claimed, then maybe the community could be involved in a new branding project to re-instate the Men of Vision as our rightful icon. I know I am personally not at all happy with the "painted pony" as it has been called, but I can wait a few years to see if it does help with marketing our community to outsiders. I am very disappointed that council did not listen to the public on this one when they had the chance.
I was able to invite many new people to the Forum at Frank Wills Hall that is scheduled for Sunday, October 3, 2010 from 7-9. I hope all candidates will be in attendance to give new citizens an opportunity to hear them answer questions. I know of no other forums this election, which is a shame, because some people make their decisions about voting for candidates based on these events.
Tomorrow I plan to continue in West Valley, and then head into Gleneagles in the evening.
Thanks to everyone who took time to talk with me about your issues. I learned a lot.
I also heard quite a bit about how unhappy some folks are with the brand and how the decision was made to change our Men of Vision "Discover the Natural West" logo. I was interested that two different families said they would agree to pay to have the old brand re-instated, even though so much money has already been wasted to change everything over. We talked a lot about how the change has affected feelings of trust for the current councillors who went against public opinion to push the new brand through. Others are unhappy with the brand, but agree that we could live with it for a few years and then review the whole process when the Sustainability Plan comes up for review. If the new brand has not worked to attract new businesses to this community as the council claimed, then maybe the community could be involved in a new branding project to re-instate the Men of Vision as our rightful icon. I know I am personally not at all happy with the "painted pony" as it has been called, but I can wait a few years to see if it does help with marketing our community to outsiders. I am very disappointed that council did not listen to the public on this one when they had the chance.
I was able to invite many new people to the Forum at Frank Wills Hall that is scheduled for Sunday, October 3, 2010 from 7-9. I hope all candidates will be in attendance to give new citizens an opportunity to hear them answer questions. I know of no other forums this election, which is a shame, because some people make their decisions about voting for candidates based on these events.
Tomorrow I plan to continue in West Valley, and then head into Gleneagles in the evening.
Thanks to everyone who took time to talk with me about your issues. I learned a lot.
Campaiging in Heritage Hills with Margaret
Last night, I campaigned in Heritage Hills with my friend Margaret. We heard many comments from new citizens who have moved into the community recently. Mostly they were concerned about the Highway 22 and Highway 1A intersection. They want a pathway connection to the rest of Town and they want to feel part of the community.
There was plenty of discussion about the possibility of a Walmart coming to the Domtar lands, some were for and some were against it. Generally, people want to know that they are welcomed to Cochrane, and that there are opportunities for them to become involved. We enjoyed chatting with some young voters who were convinced to vote for the first time in a municipal election. I did hear from one gentleman who said he will not vote for me in the election and I was very pleased that he felt he could be so candid about his reasons. This is a good sign that people take the time to explain their ideas and let me know how I might improve as a local politician. Several other citizens told me why they will be voting for me, and the discussion was therefore very balanced and useful.
I really enjoyed talking with a resident who recently moved here and works in Calgary. He talked about how lucky Cochrane is to have such a vibrant history and culture. Listening to him, I was very proud of the community and our ability to attract folks from all over Canada as the community of choice.
There was plenty of discussion about the possibility of a Walmart coming to the Domtar lands, some were for and some were against it. Generally, people want to know that they are welcomed to Cochrane, and that there are opportunities for them to become involved. We enjoyed chatting with some young voters who were convinced to vote for the first time in a municipal election. I did hear from one gentleman who said he will not vote for me in the election and I was very pleased that he felt he could be so candid about his reasons. This is a good sign that people take the time to explain their ideas and let me know how I might improve as a local politician. Several other citizens told me why they will be voting for me, and the discussion was therefore very balanced and useful.
I really enjoyed talking with a resident who recently moved here and works in Calgary. He talked about how lucky Cochrane is to have such a vibrant history and culture. Listening to him, I was very proud of the community and our ability to attract folks from all over Canada as the community of choice.
Yesterday, I campaigned in Glenbow and Heritage Hills
Glenbow residents I talked with have a range of issues, from growth and highway intersections to the possibility of a Walmart and community gardens. I was interested that the citizens who live closest to the community garden in Glenbow were not asked before hand whether they supported a garden in their community-odd that! But, overall people were ok with the garden and it looks well maintained and fruitful-pardon the pun. I wonder what other voters think of community gardens generally? I really would like to know.
At least five families I spoke with are very dillillusioned with politics and said they may not vote because their vote never changes anything. I was reminded by these folks that when I was mayor, many of the things I wanted to achieve were defeated by the majority vote of my council. I hope I was able to encourage those folks to try one more time. The motto: only those who try can ever fail-failure is a learning tool. I was encourgaed by the people who said how happy they are that I have thrown my hat back in and so on we go!
I will post later about the campaign in Heritage Hills. There were many conversations worth recalling here. I am taking a legal course today in Calgary but I hope to be around to chat with people in West Terrace/West Valley tonight. Tomorrow I will be in Gleneagles. Better get going!
At least five families I spoke with are very dillillusioned with politics and said they may not vote because their vote never changes anything. I was reminded by these folks that when I was mayor, many of the things I wanted to achieve were defeated by the majority vote of my council. I hope I was able to encourage those folks to try one more time. The motto: only those who try can ever fail-failure is a learning tool. I was encourgaed by the people who said how happy they are that I have thrown my hat back in and so on we go!
I will post later about the campaign in Heritage Hills. There were many conversations worth recalling here. I am taking a legal course today in Calgary but I hope to be around to chat with people in West Terrace/West Valley tonight. Tomorrow I will be in Gleneagles. Better get going!
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Opinions on Public Transit
As I go around town, many citizens talk about public transit and the buses being proposed for purchase by this Council. People are for and against the buses in varying degrees, but the overwhelming statement is that they hope we can afford it. For some people, they just want more open disclosure and information.
People are concerned that we are competing with private enterprise and that perhaps Council should not make any decisions with respect to expenditure on buses until after the election. It is quite a hot topic no matter where I go in Town. I have to agree that Southland should be brought into the picture and they must be on board with the Town's plans.
Public transit is something I support in principle for a number of reasons as stated in the Cochrane Sustainability Plan as a long term solution to many social, economic and environmental problems. However, it would be great if the community could be asked for their support of such a system before any significant money is spent. With community support, the Town can do anything successfully. Without community buy-in and request for such a service, introducing public transit at this time may lead to a divided community. Maybe more time is needed to properly review the proposals. If public transit as is proposed is a good thing for Cochrane and the region given the money during this "green trip" funding opportunity, it will still be a good thing after the election. What's the rush? I just hope nothing is rammed through to avoid a reasoned debate with all opinions and interests on the table. That is what people are saying, and I agree with them.
People are concerned that we are competing with private enterprise and that perhaps Council should not make any decisions with respect to expenditure on buses until after the election. It is quite a hot topic no matter where I go in Town. I have to agree that Southland should be brought into the picture and they must be on board with the Town's plans.
Public transit is something I support in principle for a number of reasons as stated in the Cochrane Sustainability Plan as a long term solution to many social, economic and environmental problems. However, it would be great if the community could be asked for their support of such a system before any significant money is spent. With community support, the Town can do anything successfully. Without community buy-in and request for such a service, introducing public transit at this time may lead to a divided community. Maybe more time is needed to properly review the proposals. If public transit as is proposed is a good thing for Cochrane and the region given the money during this "green trip" funding opportunity, it will still be a good thing after the election. What's the rush? I just hope nothing is rammed through to avoid a reasoned debate with all opinions and interests on the table. That is what people are saying, and I agree with them.
The last Saturday in September
Yesterday, as I campaigned around town I noticed the golden leaves everywhere along Cochrane's ravine systems and the Bow River. This is truly a lovely town, and fall displays the wonderful natural environment we enjoy. I spent half the day in Glenbow, the other half in Bow Meadows and the evening in the East End. I find that by meeting with citizens in all different parts of Town, I am able to get a better picture of the real common issues and shared community values.
In Glenbow, most people aare concerned about increased traffic and unmanaged growth, and several comments were made about vandalism of fences and yards. Several citizens were concerned with the Town's failure to maintain park areas. Of particular note, the Town has removed the playground equipment from a tot lot and never replaced it, nor did the Town take the time to re-landscape the area. As a result, the area has a garbage can and a few large rocks, and is empty space with an uneven surface for any kind of physcial activity, for example soccer or ball. The Town has done something similar in Cochrane Heights, whereby they removed all the playground equipment from a tot lot next to a residential area and simply did not replace it, even though the original developer dedicated the land for that purpose. The community association in Cochrane Heights has asked repeatedly for it to be replaced and the Town has done nothing about it.
I find it interesting that the Town asks community associations to attend meetings with a few members of council and adminsitration. The associations attend and relate their concerns, but nothing ever changes. I have to wonder if there is any point in these meetings or if they are just opportunities for certain councillors to extend offers to help to raise their political profiles. For example, in the East End, our community association has asked that the noise bylaw be enforced many times, and the noise issue seems to grow rather than lessen. It is really a problem for people who live adjacent to the industrial lands which were developed after the residential neighbourhood. We also told this group of councillors that we have serious concerns about the location of a proposed sidewalk, and the Town did nothing to assist the landowners to learn more about their plans-it was the community association that took over citizen notification and education about what Council was doing. If the Councillors really want to continue these meetings, they should make sure that the community associations have their issues addressed promptly so that there is something new on every agenda rather than posturing and rehashing and new promises every meeting. I would sure like to help make those sessions more collaborative and effective-and get something done!
In Bow Meadows, some citizens are still conerned that a promised pathway system in the Jumping Pound Creek floodway that was washed out in 2005 and again in 2008 has not yet been built. It seems as if the Town takes forever to get some of these simple projects done. I sure hope they have proper provincial and federal permits to work in the Jumping Pound floodway to reinstate the pathway there using the proposed culverts and hard infrastructure, all of which will likely be washed out again if the area floods in the future. There were more environmentally friendly and effective methods available to ensure that citizens had access to those hydrologically sensitive lands, but those were rejected by Council at the time. Hopefully, this project gets done quickly.
One citizen in Bow Meadows commented that he is tired of "fighting city hall", because it seems like every time there is an issue in Bow Meadows the whole community is expected to attend meetings to express their community opinions.
In Bow Meadows, I was greeted with enthusiasm and much support, and it was the first community where anyone brought up the "brand" issue. People there are not very happy with how this Council pushed the new brand down our collective throats. It has left a bad taste to many citizens, and a "tendency to gag"! I have to agree.
In the East End, citizens were concerned about the Highway 1A and Centre Ave intersection where they have to wait for long periods to turn onto Highway 1A to leave for work in the city or to get off Highway 1A into town at night on the way home. There are near misses everyday. Probably the most important note from two families I talked with was the need for some part time jobs in town for stay at home moms who may want to work while the kids are in school. People look forward to the Walmart shopping complex and see this development as an opportunity to work part of the day at retail and other jobs as a means of second income. Everyone I talked to in the East End is worried about taxation and cannot understand the system or why taxes fluctuate. There is a great need for education on the market value system and the taxation rate and why the Town seems to continue to raise taxes unchecked. People do not want Cochrane to become an elitist community where only the wealthy can continue to live here.
One woman in the East End wants to have a pesticide bylaw put in place to control the cosmetic application of pesticides on both public and private lands, and I agreed that we waste a lot of money on pesticides to get rid of dandelions and the like. Of note, those chemicals flow directly off our lawns into the storm drains and into the Bow River and tributaries. I would be happy to help the Town to get such a bylaw in place to regulate and control the cosmetic application of pesticides, and promote naturescaping as an alternative to pesticide application as well as a water conservation strategy.
That's all for now! See you out there in a bit! Thanks to all of you for taking the time to chat with me. I am enjoying every moment.
In Glenbow, most people aare concerned about increased traffic and unmanaged growth, and several comments were made about vandalism of fences and yards. Several citizens were concerned with the Town's failure to maintain park areas. Of particular note, the Town has removed the playground equipment from a tot lot and never replaced it, nor did the Town take the time to re-landscape the area. As a result, the area has a garbage can and a few large rocks, and is empty space with an uneven surface for any kind of physcial activity, for example soccer or ball. The Town has done something similar in Cochrane Heights, whereby they removed all the playground equipment from a tot lot next to a residential area and simply did not replace it, even though the original developer dedicated the land for that purpose. The community association in Cochrane Heights has asked repeatedly for it to be replaced and the Town has done nothing about it.
I find it interesting that the Town asks community associations to attend meetings with a few members of council and adminsitration. The associations attend and relate their concerns, but nothing ever changes. I have to wonder if there is any point in these meetings or if they are just opportunities for certain councillors to extend offers to help to raise their political profiles. For example, in the East End, our community association has asked that the noise bylaw be enforced many times, and the noise issue seems to grow rather than lessen. It is really a problem for people who live adjacent to the industrial lands which were developed after the residential neighbourhood. We also told this group of councillors that we have serious concerns about the location of a proposed sidewalk, and the Town did nothing to assist the landowners to learn more about their plans-it was the community association that took over citizen notification and education about what Council was doing. If the Councillors really want to continue these meetings, they should make sure that the community associations have their issues addressed promptly so that there is something new on every agenda rather than posturing and rehashing and new promises every meeting. I would sure like to help make those sessions more collaborative and effective-and get something done!
In Bow Meadows, some citizens are still conerned that a promised pathway system in the Jumping Pound Creek floodway that was washed out in 2005 and again in 2008 has not yet been built. It seems as if the Town takes forever to get some of these simple projects done. I sure hope they have proper provincial and federal permits to work in the Jumping Pound floodway to reinstate the pathway there using the proposed culverts and hard infrastructure, all of which will likely be washed out again if the area floods in the future. There were more environmentally friendly and effective methods available to ensure that citizens had access to those hydrologically sensitive lands, but those were rejected by Council at the time. Hopefully, this project gets done quickly.
One citizen in Bow Meadows commented that he is tired of "fighting city hall", because it seems like every time there is an issue in Bow Meadows the whole community is expected to attend meetings to express their community opinions.
In Bow Meadows, I was greeted with enthusiasm and much support, and it was the first community where anyone brought up the "brand" issue. People there are not very happy with how this Council pushed the new brand down our collective throats. It has left a bad taste to many citizens, and a "tendency to gag"! I have to agree.
In the East End, citizens were concerned about the Highway 1A and Centre Ave intersection where they have to wait for long periods to turn onto Highway 1A to leave for work in the city or to get off Highway 1A into town at night on the way home. There are near misses everyday. Probably the most important note from two families I talked with was the need for some part time jobs in town for stay at home moms who may want to work while the kids are in school. People look forward to the Walmart shopping complex and see this development as an opportunity to work part of the day at retail and other jobs as a means of second income. Everyone I talked to in the East End is worried about taxation and cannot understand the system or why taxes fluctuate. There is a great need for education on the market value system and the taxation rate and why the Town seems to continue to raise taxes unchecked. People do not want Cochrane to become an elitist community where only the wealthy can continue to live here.
One woman in the East End wants to have a pesticide bylaw put in place to control the cosmetic application of pesticides on both public and private lands, and I agreed that we waste a lot of money on pesticides to get rid of dandelions and the like. Of note, those chemicals flow directly off our lawns into the storm drains and into the Bow River and tributaries. I would be happy to help the Town to get such a bylaw in place to regulate and control the cosmetic application of pesticides, and promote naturescaping as an alternative to pesticide application as well as a water conservation strategy.
That's all for now! See you out there in a bit! Thanks to all of you for taking the time to chat with me. I am enjoying every moment.
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Signs
In case anyone wonders, I do not have any signs on public lands this election. I am only putting signs on private property where someone asks for a sign from me. This is to prevent vandalism and I refuse to litter public lands with signage.
I noticed today that someone has torn down all the signs that were posted by the Alliance Church, and I would ask people to stop doing such a wasteful and destructive act. These signs are paid for by the candidates and are valuable private property. There is no need to touch what does not belong to you, as my mother would say.
Please, let's all be respectful of one another this election and support the candidates who are working so hard to become your representatives. To show how serious I am about this, I will take the time to stop by the Alliance Church on my campaign today and put those signs back up-and candidates-I know you read this-use screws instead of staples on your stakes-staples don't work and give vandals a means to destroy your hard work keeping signs in place-if you have used staples I won't be able to put them back if I see them lying flat!.
Let's work hard together and play fair for the next three weeks! Elections are about community building, not wasteful and childish vandalism or stupid acts of retaliation and vengence!
I noticed today that someone has torn down all the signs that were posted by the Alliance Church, and I would ask people to stop doing such a wasteful and destructive act. These signs are paid for by the candidates and are valuable private property. There is no need to touch what does not belong to you, as my mother would say.
Please, let's all be respectful of one another this election and support the candidates who are working so hard to become your representatives. To show how serious I am about this, I will take the time to stop by the Alliance Church on my campaign today and put those signs back up-and candidates-I know you read this-use screws instead of staples on your stakes-staples don't work and give vandals a means to destroy your hard work keeping signs in place-if you have used staples I won't be able to put them back if I see them lying flat!.
Let's work hard together and play fair for the next three weeks! Elections are about community building, not wasteful and childish vandalism or stupid acts of retaliation and vengence!
East End and Glenbow
Last night, I worked in the East End. There are many concerns about traffic and noise, and of particular interest, one family raised concerns about a tow truck business and day homes operating from residential areas in other parts of town without proper office in the home permits. Bylaws are another concern, because people think no-one enforces the bylaws and complaints are not resolved in any way anyone can predict.
The entire transportation network throughout the community is questioned because of increased traffic due to growth in all sectors. People using Griffin Road to access recreational facilities are competing with industrial traffic, logging trucks, school buses, etc and the intersections need improvements-for example, why not have right turn lanes at the four way stop at River and Griffin so that people can move through the intersection without having to wait at a four way stop for those going through the intersection east west? There is plenty of room to accommodate these right turn lanes. I thought the issues raised were very helpful and the proposed solutions reasonable.
Today I will be in Glenbow and Bow Meadows. I hope to get everywhere before the election so I better get a move on!
The entire transportation network throughout the community is questioned because of increased traffic due to growth in all sectors. People using Griffin Road to access recreational facilities are competing with industrial traffic, logging trucks, school buses, etc and the intersections need improvements-for example, why not have right turn lanes at the four way stop at River and Griffin so that people can move through the intersection without having to wait at a four way stop for those going through the intersection east west? There is plenty of room to accommodate these right turn lanes. I thought the issues raised were very helpful and the proposed solutions reasonable.
Today I will be in Glenbow and Bow Meadows. I hope to get everywhere before the election so I better get a move on!
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Riverside Place; Riverview and Carolina Drive
When canvassing, it sometimes gets dark before you complete a neighbourhood. Somedays, I spend the whole time circling the community and finishing off neighbourhoods where this has happened. Yesterday, I really enjoyed all these visits, despite the rain.
In Riverside Place, I met Paul and Ed who took the time to tell me about their common issues with the Millenium Creek restoration which has altered the nature of the spring fed creek they used to enjoy. I will definitely be looking into this matter. Sometimes, these restoration projects can interfere with nature, so to speak, and this is what seems to have occurred. Apparently, that area used to have several species of birds and now they are gone. This indicates interference with food sources and nesting habitat. It is worth looking into. As well, while the sound barrier is much appreciated, it is a concern that the bottom of the barrier was never finished properly. That should be attended to. The concern is that the Town does not follow through on its construction contracts to completion and we get substandard installations. I checked the sound barrier on the way out, and the residents' concerns are valid.
In Riverview, several citizens spoke with me. I did not find those missing eyeglasses on my tour-sorry! However, I did speak with two families quite extensively. The major concern is speeding, but second to that is the concern that the neighbourhood is being redeveloped without Area Structure Planning. For example, Rocky View is selling its property near the bridge, and the Town is not acquiring it as was assumed. Who is buying that land, and for what purposes? While some citizens welcome Walmart, some are worried about the fate of the local business community who cannot compete with such a large retailer downtown. All are pleased to have the Domtar lands redeveloped after clean-up, and hope that the Town will require a sidewalk on Griffin Road to connect them to the new commercial area and the Safeway/Canadian Tire complex. They were also concerned that there is no direct connection between Riverview and Bow Valley School where their children attend. I agree that there should be walking paths to enable a healthier lifestyle for the kids to get to school rather than having to be bussed.
People I spoke with in Riverview are concerned with the Fireside development in the southwest corner of Town. They were worried about the Town's treatment of wetlands and natural habitat, and don't understand why development was allowed to leapfrog over the country residential homes adjacent to George Fox Trail. I too am concerned by this development and have spoken out many times about the issues. The development should not have preceded a proper Area C Area Structure Planning process that was promised during annexation talks with Rocky View. It seems that the last two councils have breached that annexation agreement in several ways. The relationships between Cochrane and Rocky View were fantastic in 2004, and I wonder what is going on.
There are also issues with lack of maintenance of green spaces and playgrounds, and care for trees that were planted in the park areas. This issue is common everywhere I go-the Town is not maintaining the parks and common areas with any level of attention that people can enjoy.
I finished off the evening on Carolina Drive. Great conversations there. I was very happy to chat about the Town's Request For Proposal process that does not seem to target local entrepreneurs and businesses. The "shop local" mantra of the late 1990s has been set aside, even though shopping locally is one of the 13 Pathways of the Cochrane Sustainability Plan. The Town needs to ensure that local entrepreneurs are sought out in the RFP process and can fairly tender on projects. For example, if the Town wants Dell computers, no local company can bid on that because only Dell sells Dell. Maybe what the Town needs to do is look at what they want the computer system to achieve and then ask for proposal from local companies who can provide those exact specifications at the most reasonable price. If you say you want IPads and IPhones only Mac can provide those. If you want the computer capabilities of those specific models maybe we could ask the local computer agencies to tender on the required specifications. As well, introducing Macs into the Town is not cost effective because we have PCs throughout the corporation. Interesting, huh!?
The Town's RFP process is something I want to look at carefully. It is unacceptable to have 2-5 people tendering proposals for the work we need done in any project. Why are we not attracting a whole bunch of tenders? Who is on the RFP list? How do you get on the RFP list? Great questions that I will review once elected.
Water supply was the topic of the evening with one citizen. We discussed the transfer system and the selling of water. Cochrane needs a secure water supply, and once elected I will go after it. We cannot continue to grow without a secure water supply in place.
In Riverside Place, I met Paul and Ed who took the time to tell me about their common issues with the Millenium Creek restoration which has altered the nature of the spring fed creek they used to enjoy. I will definitely be looking into this matter. Sometimes, these restoration projects can interfere with nature, so to speak, and this is what seems to have occurred. Apparently, that area used to have several species of birds and now they are gone. This indicates interference with food sources and nesting habitat. It is worth looking into. As well, while the sound barrier is much appreciated, it is a concern that the bottom of the barrier was never finished properly. That should be attended to. The concern is that the Town does not follow through on its construction contracts to completion and we get substandard installations. I checked the sound barrier on the way out, and the residents' concerns are valid.
In Riverview, several citizens spoke with me. I did not find those missing eyeglasses on my tour-sorry! However, I did speak with two families quite extensively. The major concern is speeding, but second to that is the concern that the neighbourhood is being redeveloped without Area Structure Planning. For example, Rocky View is selling its property near the bridge, and the Town is not acquiring it as was assumed. Who is buying that land, and for what purposes? While some citizens welcome Walmart, some are worried about the fate of the local business community who cannot compete with such a large retailer downtown. All are pleased to have the Domtar lands redeveloped after clean-up, and hope that the Town will require a sidewalk on Griffin Road to connect them to the new commercial area and the Safeway/Canadian Tire complex. They were also concerned that there is no direct connection between Riverview and Bow Valley School where their children attend. I agree that there should be walking paths to enable a healthier lifestyle for the kids to get to school rather than having to be bussed.
People I spoke with in Riverview are concerned with the Fireside development in the southwest corner of Town. They were worried about the Town's treatment of wetlands and natural habitat, and don't understand why development was allowed to leapfrog over the country residential homes adjacent to George Fox Trail. I too am concerned by this development and have spoken out many times about the issues. The development should not have preceded a proper Area C Area Structure Planning process that was promised during annexation talks with Rocky View. It seems that the last two councils have breached that annexation agreement in several ways. The relationships between Cochrane and Rocky View were fantastic in 2004, and I wonder what is going on.
There are also issues with lack of maintenance of green spaces and playgrounds, and care for trees that were planted in the park areas. This issue is common everywhere I go-the Town is not maintaining the parks and common areas with any level of attention that people can enjoy.
I finished off the evening on Carolina Drive. Great conversations there. I was very happy to chat about the Town's Request For Proposal process that does not seem to target local entrepreneurs and businesses. The "shop local" mantra of the late 1990s has been set aside, even though shopping locally is one of the 13 Pathways of the Cochrane Sustainability Plan. The Town needs to ensure that local entrepreneurs are sought out in the RFP process and can fairly tender on projects. For example, if the Town wants Dell computers, no local company can bid on that because only Dell sells Dell. Maybe what the Town needs to do is look at what they want the computer system to achieve and then ask for proposal from local companies who can provide those exact specifications at the most reasonable price. If you say you want IPads and IPhones only Mac can provide those. If you want the computer capabilities of those specific models maybe we could ask the local computer agencies to tender on the required specifications. As well, introducing Macs into the Town is not cost effective because we have PCs throughout the corporation. Interesting, huh!?
The Town's RFP process is something I want to look at carefully. It is unacceptable to have 2-5 people tendering proposals for the work we need done in any project. Why are we not attracting a whole bunch of tenders? Who is on the RFP list? How do you get on the RFP list? Great questions that I will review once elected.
Water supply was the topic of the evening with one citizen. We discussed the transfer system and the selling of water. Cochrane needs a secure water supply, and once elected I will go after it. We cannot continue to grow without a secure water supply in place.
Nomination Day
September 20 was nomination day. There are 10 people running for 6 council seats and the Mayor is challenged by one person. This will be an interesting election after all.
Immediately after filing my nomination papers, I hit the trail. First, I finished canvassing a neighbourhood in Sunset Ridge. Major intersections, speeding, lack of bylaw enforcement, developer apathy towards common areas, and extensive erosion were common concerns. I was shocked to see the amount of erosion that is happening there and really concerned that the Town does not require better storm water management and erosion control from the developer. There is construction debris in the ravines and the common areas are full of weeds as noted in an earlier post. It seems that there is a lot of talk and no action, and people are "fed up". One citizen said he doesn't believe anyone at the Town cares about the new residents, and he said given the troubles they have, their taxes (around $4,000 a year) should be pro-rated. I was very concerned that his street floods when it rains-in a new subdivision this is a red flag that the storm drainage system is defective-the Town's engineering department should make sure this is addressed before the Final Acceptance Certificate is issued for that infrastructure, otherwise the community will have to pay to fix that drainage system in the future.
Of interest, there are fossils in the area that don't seem to have gathered any attention from the Town or Province. One landowner was concerned that the developer was given permission to strip and grade prior to proper historical resource investigations. I will look into this once elected, and will visit the area where he said the fossils are located when I canvass further into the subdivision.
When I left Sunset Ridge, I went to Riverside Place, then into Riverview to finish a neighbourhood there, and in the evening I canvassed among my neighbours on Carolina Drive. My box of fliers is diminishing, and I feel great. Thanks to everyone who is keeping pace with me on this blog, for all the laughter and encouragement. I will post the other conversations I had last night in a new posting.
Immediately after filing my nomination papers, I hit the trail. First, I finished canvassing a neighbourhood in Sunset Ridge. Major intersections, speeding, lack of bylaw enforcement, developer apathy towards common areas, and extensive erosion were common concerns. I was shocked to see the amount of erosion that is happening there and really concerned that the Town does not require better storm water management and erosion control from the developer. There is construction debris in the ravines and the common areas are full of weeds as noted in an earlier post. It seems that there is a lot of talk and no action, and people are "fed up". One citizen said he doesn't believe anyone at the Town cares about the new residents, and he said given the troubles they have, their taxes (around $4,000 a year) should be pro-rated. I was very concerned that his street floods when it rains-in a new subdivision this is a red flag that the storm drainage system is defective-the Town's engineering department should make sure this is addressed before the Final Acceptance Certificate is issued for that infrastructure, otherwise the community will have to pay to fix that drainage system in the future.
Of interest, there are fossils in the area that don't seem to have gathered any attention from the Town or Province. One landowner was concerned that the developer was given permission to strip and grade prior to proper historical resource investigations. I will look into this once elected, and will visit the area where he said the fossils are located when I canvass further into the subdivision.
When I left Sunset Ridge, I went to Riverside Place, then into Riverview to finish a neighbourhood there, and in the evening I canvassed among my neighbours on Carolina Drive. My box of fliers is diminishing, and I feel great. Thanks to everyone who is keeping pace with me on this blog, for all the laughter and encouragement. I will post the other conversations I had last night in a new posting.
Monday, September 20, 2010
Thank you for following my blog
For all of you who are following my blog, thanks a million! It is great to meet you and talk to you about what you are reading here. I hope it is providing you with food for thought and information about other parts of your community.
Last Weekend
For two days on the weekend, I canvassed in West Valley. I was surprised by all the new people in that neighbourhood, the several houses that were vacant and the ones for sale. I was able to talk with a number of folks and spent some time having one on one visits. The issues really centre around urban sprawl, lack of planning for growth, and Highway 22. One gentleman suggested that the Town use cost benefit analysis when making investments into infrastructure, services and facilities. His suggestion fits within the new taxation policy that I would like to implement.
He provided that we often do not account for the incidental economic spinoffs that we achieve by investing in facilities that attract people to our community-such as swimming pools that are big enough for tournaments, hockey arenas, and of course performing arts facilities. He suggested that for every development proposal, we should investigate all the potential benefits and costs associated with the project, and then determine net benefit or cost. His idea is that we might change our priorities and invest more appropriately if we actually work through such an exercise every time decision making is employed. Short term gains we achieve through some projects may actually lead to long term costs for generations-a perfect example of this is the sewage pipeline to Calgary that Cochrane will be re-negotiating soon-it was only a 10 year agreement at the time it was finalized. For ten years, Cochrane has benefitted from that agreement-but long term costs may be another story.
The urban sprawl comments were very common. Our facilities and infrastructure are not planned in advance of the growth. We allow development pressures from landowners to push development along that has no associated services, commercial aspect, or connection to the town. In many cases, the developments in the "suburbs" of Cochrane do not produce net benefits to our community, but lead to further and further costs associated with servicing the residents who move there. The resident in West Valley believes that residential development is a net cost to the community.
Highway 22 is a bit of a problem as it runs through Cochrane, but also provides a wonderful opportunity for Cochrane to have a vibrant highway commercial district because goods and services can move along the north south highway to all parts of Alberta. To maximize these opportunities we have to plan developments that do not create traffic hazards to industrial traffic. I agree.
Overall, West Valley citizens I talked to are engaged citizens who want the opportunity to be responsible citizens who contribute and make things happen-they embrace the culture of responsibility. I look forward to several more days and evenings in that part of this wonderful community.
Today I canvassed in three areas of Cochrane, and I have many comments from those citizens-time for a new post!
He provided that we often do not account for the incidental economic spinoffs that we achieve by investing in facilities that attract people to our community-such as swimming pools that are big enough for tournaments, hockey arenas, and of course performing arts facilities. He suggested that for every development proposal, we should investigate all the potential benefits and costs associated with the project, and then determine net benefit or cost. His idea is that we might change our priorities and invest more appropriately if we actually work through such an exercise every time decision making is employed. Short term gains we achieve through some projects may actually lead to long term costs for generations-a perfect example of this is the sewage pipeline to Calgary that Cochrane will be re-negotiating soon-it was only a 10 year agreement at the time it was finalized. For ten years, Cochrane has benefitted from that agreement-but long term costs may be another story.
The urban sprawl comments were very common. Our facilities and infrastructure are not planned in advance of the growth. We allow development pressures from landowners to push development along that has no associated services, commercial aspect, or connection to the town. In many cases, the developments in the "suburbs" of Cochrane do not produce net benefits to our community, but lead to further and further costs associated with servicing the residents who move there. The resident in West Valley believes that residential development is a net cost to the community.
Highway 22 is a bit of a problem as it runs through Cochrane, but also provides a wonderful opportunity for Cochrane to have a vibrant highway commercial district because goods and services can move along the north south highway to all parts of Alberta. To maximize these opportunities we have to plan developments that do not create traffic hazards to industrial traffic. I agree.
Overall, West Valley citizens I talked to are engaged citizens who want the opportunity to be responsible citizens who contribute and make things happen-they embrace the culture of responsibility. I look forward to several more days and evenings in that part of this wonderful community.
Today I canvassed in three areas of Cochrane, and I have many comments from those citizens-time for a new post!
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Campaigning in Sunset Ridge with Andy
Tonight, I met some of the most friendly, diverse and interesting people ever in Sunset Ridge. They certainly have a lovely view. I was most impressed with the passion that I heard about the neighbourhood and the sense of pride and ownership people demonstrate. Almost every home has some element of naturescaping, and the ingidenous species used in rain gardens are hardy and well selected and assembled for water conservation. The neighbours are truly land and water stewards.
There were five main issues:
1. The lack of care of common areas by the Town and the developer-there are weeds everywhere and the little lansdscaping of boulevards that has taken place has been let go wild with no maintenance-this is not naturescaing-it is absolute neglect of common lands. There is debris in the ravines, thistles and other invasives everywhere and no matter what the citizens do, nothing gets cleaned up. Everyone just blames the other guy. I suggested forming a community association or neighbourhood stewardship group and those ideas were met with excitement. I sense that people just want permission to get out there and help take care of these lands. Erosion and lack of proper storm drainage management is obvious. Something needs to be done-enough talk and empty promises!
2. Speeding. While I stood there, five drivers went through a stop sign without so much as tapping the brake. I was absolutely appalled, given the large number of pre-schoolers who live in those houses. The Town should immediately get out there and give out some tickets and do so on a regular basis. That entrance way to the neighbourhood off the main drag is like a freeway! Speed bumps may be something to explore. Certainly the Traffic Control Bylaw needs to be enforced, and not for errant RVs!
3. Getting through Highway 22 and Highway 1A intersection takes citizens in Sunset Ridge anywhere from 10 minutes to 25 minutes during busy rush hour times on week days and even longer on weekends-they want some left turn lanes-so do I!
4. Using the storm pond for recreation-some citizens would like the Town to help them mainain the storm pond as a skating pond during the winter. Right now the citizens who like to gather there for winter events are told that they cannot skate on that pond. This is a wasted amenity.
5. Lack of proper access and no connectivity-any pathways they do have are finished with pea gravel so bikes and baby carriages cannot be used safely. The pathway slopes are too steep and erosion is rampant. 4th Avenue has been closed and is not maintained even as a connector pathway to the rest of Town.
There is a lot to be done in Sunset Ridge and yet, the people were interested in the election, telling jokes, welcoming, happy and overall optimistic. Thank you to everyone who took the time to stop and chat with Andy and me. We truly enjoyed it. I will be back.
There were five main issues:
1. The lack of care of common areas by the Town and the developer-there are weeds everywhere and the little lansdscaping of boulevards that has taken place has been let go wild with no maintenance-this is not naturescaing-it is absolute neglect of common lands. There is debris in the ravines, thistles and other invasives everywhere and no matter what the citizens do, nothing gets cleaned up. Everyone just blames the other guy. I suggested forming a community association or neighbourhood stewardship group and those ideas were met with excitement. I sense that people just want permission to get out there and help take care of these lands. Erosion and lack of proper storm drainage management is obvious. Something needs to be done-enough talk and empty promises!
2. Speeding. While I stood there, five drivers went through a stop sign without so much as tapping the brake. I was absolutely appalled, given the large number of pre-schoolers who live in those houses. The Town should immediately get out there and give out some tickets and do so on a regular basis. That entrance way to the neighbourhood off the main drag is like a freeway! Speed bumps may be something to explore. Certainly the Traffic Control Bylaw needs to be enforced, and not for errant RVs!
3. Getting through Highway 22 and Highway 1A intersection takes citizens in Sunset Ridge anywhere from 10 minutes to 25 minutes during busy rush hour times on week days and even longer on weekends-they want some left turn lanes-so do I!
4. Using the storm pond for recreation-some citizens would like the Town to help them mainain the storm pond as a skating pond during the winter. Right now the citizens who like to gather there for winter events are told that they cannot skate on that pond. This is a wasted amenity.
5. Lack of proper access and no connectivity-any pathways they do have are finished with pea gravel so bikes and baby carriages cannot be used safely. The pathway slopes are too steep and erosion is rampant. 4th Avenue has been closed and is not maintained even as a connector pathway to the rest of Town.
There is a lot to be done in Sunset Ridge and yet, the people were interested in the election, telling jokes, welcoming, happy and overall optimistic. Thank you to everyone who took the time to stop and chat with Andy and me. We truly enjoyed it. I will be back.
East End and Sunset Ridge
Yesterday, I canvassed in the East End of Cochrane. The primary issue raised was about the traffic problems getting out of the East End in the morning and getting back into the East End in the evening due to trains, school buses and main intersections not being properly controlled. Of particular concern is the Highway 1A and Centre Ave intersection, followed closely by the Highway 1A and Highway 22 intersection. These issues are also of concern to me.
I heard from one family about noise caused by a neighbour and how hard it is to get bylaw officers to enforce the nuisance bylaw. Noise in the East End is a real problem due to the industrial sector, and the community association has filed numerous complaints with the Town about this matter to no avail. Nothing seems to change. The radios at All Span still pour out music and the work vehicles still start up before 8:00 am on Saturday with beepers, etc.
Three families asked about whether the pool will be built before their pre-school aged children graduate from high school and I said I certianly would work on getting that facility developed if elected. We have needed a pool and a performing arts centre for over 10 years-enough studies-let's pool (no pun intended) all resources from all levels of government, and all adjacent communities who use our facilities and get these facilities built.
The location of the pathway connector from the rec centre troubled a few citizens who want a pathway across the tracks but not if it means trees will be cut down or established landscaping disturbed. I was able to talk about the meetings the community association has had with the Town to try and resolve those issues with the people who will be affected.
Generally, I thank my friends and neighbours in the East End for all their interest in my campaign, wishes for success and ideas. Without your support, I would feel lost.
Tonight I campaigned in Sunset Ridge. Somehow, no matter how far apart these neighbourhoods are, the issues are similar. I will post a new post about Sunset Ridge.
I heard from one family about noise caused by a neighbour and how hard it is to get bylaw officers to enforce the nuisance bylaw. Noise in the East End is a real problem due to the industrial sector, and the community association has filed numerous complaints with the Town about this matter to no avail. Nothing seems to change. The radios at All Span still pour out music and the work vehicles still start up before 8:00 am on Saturday with beepers, etc.
Three families asked about whether the pool will be built before their pre-school aged children graduate from high school and I said I certianly would work on getting that facility developed if elected. We have needed a pool and a performing arts centre for over 10 years-enough studies-let's pool (no pun intended) all resources from all levels of government, and all adjacent communities who use our facilities and get these facilities built.
The location of the pathway connector from the rec centre troubled a few citizens who want a pathway across the tracks but not if it means trees will be cut down or established landscaping disturbed. I was able to talk about the meetings the community association has had with the Town to try and resolve those issues with the people who will be affected.
Generally, I thank my friends and neighbours in the East End for all their interest in my campaign, wishes for success and ideas. Without your support, I would feel lost.
Tonight I campaigned in Sunset Ridge. Somehow, no matter how far apart these neighbourhoods are, the issues are similar. I will post a new post about Sunset Ridge.
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Town's Agreement with Springwood
In Riverview, I chatted with a number of people who are pleased to see the Domtar lands currently owned by Cochrane Properties being cleaned up by Springwood, the developer who is purportedly ready to purchase the lands from Cochrane Properties.
One of the common concerns people have is that the Town is picking up the tab for the costs of the Centre Street connector, and all the underground utilities through these lands that would normally be the requirement of the developer to construct at its own cost and then turn over to the Town upon completion, and the Town is using taxes, and grant monies from the province and the federal government to do so. People also ask about what kind of tax concessions the landowner is getting. There are several tax deferrals and tax concessions. People also want to know whether Domtar remains liable for the contamination in the groundwater that so far the Town and the Province do not require to be cleaned up. The "hotspot" will be "capped", but not cleaned up.
Domtar will remain liable for the contamination, even though all the subsequent purchasers also remain liable for the contamination. That is the excuse that Springwood has given why the lands could not be subdivided and why the Town could not be transferred any municipal reserve lands. Springwood offered the Town $79,000 as cash in lieu for an equivalent of almost 8 acres of developable lands they would have been required to provide for Town purposes, and the council accepted that amount of money. This seems rather odd. Municipal reserves are typically lands ready to be developed, and in the downtown core area, these lands would be worth significantly more than $79,000. Don't you think? At least if municipal reserved were required to be dedicated. Was there a market value assessment of the developable lands done?
Springwood provided, apparently, that their development plan would only work if the lands are not further subdivided. In such a case, the Town would not be entitled to any municipal reserve lands, because it is only if the lands are subdivided that municipal reserves can be taken from a landowner without paying compensation to the landowner. Something makes no sense here-I cannot imagine why the money was offered as cash in lieu for something the Town was not entitled to in this case?
I have pasted the link to the recently announced Memorandum of Understanding between the Town and Springwood below. Please note that Springwood was still not the landowner, but remains a propsective purchaser. This was clarified in section 8 of the MOU itself.
There has been a lot of chest thumping and cheerleading about what a great cooperative arrangement this is and how Cochrane citizens will all benefit so much from this deal. I do see the benefits of having the lands developed, but at what cost to you and me, the average taxpayer? Are we subsidizing this development, and why? Is this developer being treated differently than other developers, something this council said would not occur-all developers were to be treated the same? What do you think? I really would appreciate your thoughts.
http://www.cochrane.ca/municipal/toc/webcms.nsf/AllDoc/B5C80B023FE38489872577740058F99D/$File/MOU-304GriffinRoadMar2010.pdf
One of the common concerns people have is that the Town is picking up the tab for the costs of the Centre Street connector, and all the underground utilities through these lands that would normally be the requirement of the developer to construct at its own cost and then turn over to the Town upon completion, and the Town is using taxes, and grant monies from the province and the federal government to do so. People also ask about what kind of tax concessions the landowner is getting. There are several tax deferrals and tax concessions. People also want to know whether Domtar remains liable for the contamination in the groundwater that so far the Town and the Province do not require to be cleaned up. The "hotspot" will be "capped", but not cleaned up.
Domtar will remain liable for the contamination, even though all the subsequent purchasers also remain liable for the contamination. That is the excuse that Springwood has given why the lands could not be subdivided and why the Town could not be transferred any municipal reserve lands. Springwood offered the Town $79,000 as cash in lieu for an equivalent of almost 8 acres of developable lands they would have been required to provide for Town purposes, and the council accepted that amount of money. This seems rather odd. Municipal reserves are typically lands ready to be developed, and in the downtown core area, these lands would be worth significantly more than $79,000. Don't you think? At least if municipal reserved were required to be dedicated. Was there a market value assessment of the developable lands done?
Springwood provided, apparently, that their development plan would only work if the lands are not further subdivided. In such a case, the Town would not be entitled to any municipal reserve lands, because it is only if the lands are subdivided that municipal reserves can be taken from a landowner without paying compensation to the landowner. Something makes no sense here-I cannot imagine why the money was offered as cash in lieu for something the Town was not entitled to in this case?
I have pasted the link to the recently announced Memorandum of Understanding between the Town and Springwood below. Please note that Springwood was still not the landowner, but remains a propsective purchaser. This was clarified in section 8 of the MOU itself.
There has been a lot of chest thumping and cheerleading about what a great cooperative arrangement this is and how Cochrane citizens will all benefit so much from this deal. I do see the benefits of having the lands developed, but at what cost to you and me, the average taxpayer? Are we subsidizing this development, and why? Is this developer being treated differently than other developers, something this council said would not occur-all developers were to be treated the same? What do you think? I really would appreciate your thoughts.
http://www.cochrane.ca/municipal/toc/webcms.nsf/AllDoc/B5C80B023FE38489872577740058F99D/$File/MOU-304GriffinRoadMar2010.pdf
Monday, September 13, 2010
RVs and Trailers in residential areas
When campaigning in Riverview yesterday I met a few people who had received tickets under section 12 of the Land Use Bylaw, with respect to storage of RVs and trailers on private property. The link to the relevant provision is pasted below:
http://www.cochrane.ca/municipal/cochrane/cochrane-website.nsf/AllDoc/7B997B2E4FF4843D8725757D0054452C/$File/RV%20Section%20-%20Land%20Use%20Bylaw.pdf
There are also provisions that regulate and control parking of RVs and trailers on the town's streets and laneways-all are called "highways" under the Traffic Control Bylaw and also the provincial Traffic Safety Act.
The problem with section 12 of the Land Use Bylaw is that the provisions are completely arbitrary and senseless, and even discriminatory. If you live in a residential district with a strip of yard next to the driveway, you can park an RV, but if you don't have such an arrangement, you have to find some way to park your RV in the backyard or sideyard or not at all. The provisions do not reflect any safety considerations, any aethsetic issues or any real concerns that I heard when on council previously. These provisions need to be thoroughly examined, because they are causing real hardships to people who use their RVs and trailers during the fall and winter.
I hope to be able to have a review of these provisions. I have never agreed with the logic or illogic of the provisions and why they were enacted in the first place.
The provisions under the Traffic Control Bylaw are also needing a good review.
http://www.cochrane.ca/municipal/cochrane/cochrane-website.nsf/AllDoc/7B997B2E4FF4843D8725757D0054452C/$File/RV%20Section%20-%20Land%20Use%20Bylaw.pdf
There are also provisions that regulate and control parking of RVs and trailers on the town's streets and laneways-all are called "highways" under the Traffic Control Bylaw and also the provincial Traffic Safety Act.
The problem with section 12 of the Land Use Bylaw is that the provisions are completely arbitrary and senseless, and even discriminatory. If you live in a residential district with a strip of yard next to the driveway, you can park an RV, but if you don't have such an arrangement, you have to find some way to park your RV in the backyard or sideyard or not at all. The provisions do not reflect any safety considerations, any aethsetic issues or any real concerns that I heard when on council previously. These provisions need to be thoroughly examined, because they are causing real hardships to people who use their RVs and trailers during the fall and winter.
I hope to be able to have a review of these provisions. I have never agreed with the logic or illogic of the provisions and why they were enacted in the first place.
The provisions under the Traffic Control Bylaw are also needing a good review.
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Riverview
Today, I went door to door in Riverview most of the afternoon. It is always difficult to judge whether campaigning on Sunday afternoon is beneficial, but today's response was very favourable. I enjoyed all the conversations, the offers to help and encouragement.
The issues I heard about today centered on whether Cochrane is ready for a Walmart on the Domtar lands, and public transit, especially for seniors.
Some citizens remain adamantly opposed to big box stores in the downtown core, and feel that by introducing big boxes we will lose our small town feel. I was able to share that the new proposal does include some residential development, fewer big boxes and a mall similar to what you see on Stephen Avenue in Calgary. Some were upset that the Town is building the road for the developer at taxpayer's expense. On the flip side, two families can't wait for the Walmart because it will be in walking distance from their homes. Both these families are seniors on fixed budgets and they welcome facilities close to where they live where they can shop for products that are more affordable.
Public transit within Cochrane is welcomed by the seniors I met today who would love to have such a service for doctor's appointments and shopping, as well as getting to the RancheHouse and the rec centre. Public transit to Calgary where people have more options to leave home and return home at different times of day are also championed by seniors. One person was very opposed to the double decker buses and thinks Cochrane will lose money over time in operations. She was concerned about the Town subsidizing a public system in competition with Southland. We talked a lot about this problem and we both agreed that Southland should be given the opportunity to provide whatever service the Town proposes as the main contractor given their entrepreneurial spirit. We also talked about a comparable problem with town operated door to door recycling that would compete with a local service provider. It was great to discuss the issues with knowledgeable, engaged citizens who look at all sides of the debate.
One woman I met needs a tutor for grade 11 mathematics for her high school child. If you or someone you know provides mathematics tutoring, let me know and I can get you connected. Make sure you have some references.
I talked with several families about the Sustainability Plan and I will post the link here again because it seems to be very interesting to people I talk to.
http://cochranesustainability.ca/
Generally, the people I met today want to be more involved. As I would expect, no-one was thrilled with the condominium development on the driving range that goes against what they were promised back in 2004-2007 when that development was being approved. For example, they were promised that there would be no access onto Riverview Circle, and of course there is. However, the owners of the condos where I visited so far are pleased to have that kind of housing option, and enjoy the development.
I will post more about my visits today tomorrow night, as this entry is getting long.
The issues I heard about today centered on whether Cochrane is ready for a Walmart on the Domtar lands, and public transit, especially for seniors.
Some citizens remain adamantly opposed to big box stores in the downtown core, and feel that by introducing big boxes we will lose our small town feel. I was able to share that the new proposal does include some residential development, fewer big boxes and a mall similar to what you see on Stephen Avenue in Calgary. Some were upset that the Town is building the road for the developer at taxpayer's expense. On the flip side, two families can't wait for the Walmart because it will be in walking distance from their homes. Both these families are seniors on fixed budgets and they welcome facilities close to where they live where they can shop for products that are more affordable.
Public transit within Cochrane is welcomed by the seniors I met today who would love to have such a service for doctor's appointments and shopping, as well as getting to the RancheHouse and the rec centre. Public transit to Calgary where people have more options to leave home and return home at different times of day are also championed by seniors. One person was very opposed to the double decker buses and thinks Cochrane will lose money over time in operations. She was concerned about the Town subsidizing a public system in competition with Southland. We talked a lot about this problem and we both agreed that Southland should be given the opportunity to provide whatever service the Town proposes as the main contractor given their entrepreneurial spirit. We also talked about a comparable problem with town operated door to door recycling that would compete with a local service provider. It was great to discuss the issues with knowledgeable, engaged citizens who look at all sides of the debate.
One woman I met needs a tutor for grade 11 mathematics for her high school child. If you or someone you know provides mathematics tutoring, let me know and I can get you connected. Make sure you have some references.
I talked with several families about the Sustainability Plan and I will post the link here again because it seems to be very interesting to people I talk to.
http://cochranesustainability.ca/
Generally, the people I met today want to be more involved. As I would expect, no-one was thrilled with the condominium development on the driving range that goes against what they were promised back in 2004-2007 when that development was being approved. For example, they were promised that there would be no access onto Riverview Circle, and of course there is. However, the owners of the condos where I visited so far are pleased to have that kind of housing option, and enjoy the development.
I will post more about my visits today tomorrow night, as this entry is getting long.
Highway 22 and Highway 1A Intersection
I have to thank Rory for his excellent comment below on whether the intersection is the responsibility of the Province.
The reconstruction, or attention to improving that intersection is the responsibility of the Province. However, it is the responsibility and jurisdiction of the Town to have traffic safety reports done and notify the Province if provincial highways are causing safety concerns within the municipality. In this case, the safety issues must be addressed as soon as possible. This matter should be of highest priority to this council until the matter is resolved.
On past councils, I was always able to work well with the Province to ensure that traffic lights were installed at interstections that had become safety concerns within our community. Janis Tarchuk, our MLA worked with us, and I wonder what has happened to that relationship. For example, I was told when mayor that it would be ten years before we had lights on Griffin and Highway 22, and at George Fox Trail and Highway 22, but the council of the day was able to move that forward. It took time, resolve and perserverance! As you all know, I have plenty of all three when it comes to safety to Cochrane citizens.
The Highway 22/Highway 1A intersection does need major redesign to accommodate future growth, however there are some obvious improvements that can be done immediately that may address the ongoing issues. For example, there are no advanced left turn lights. This encourages people turning left coming down the hill or turning onto Highway 1A from Highway 22 to dart through the intersection in front of oncoming traffic. I have seen many close calls. It is also an obvious solution to ensure that people who want to turn right onto Highway 1A from Highway 22 have a dedicated lane to do so. This would allow people turning right to move out of the northbound lane and ease up the line of traffic. Getting through that intersection can take 25 minutes during busy times of day!
The most important thing for the Province to do is to stop people from passing on the right to get around the people who are trying to turn left onto Highway 1A from Highway 22. There is no dedicated lane to allow people to pass northbound traffic on the right, and therefore, that maneouver is actually illegal and dangerous. That is where all the darting happens with near misses where someone may be killed, when people decide they have waited too long to turn into Town when coming down the hill, or to get onto westbound Highway 1A. Some days there are line ups all the way past the Quigley Drive intersection and all the way up the hill past the Sunset Ridge developments coming south. These traffic issues are not going away. The Council must address these matters asap. Someone will be seriously hurt if nothing is done!
When elected, I plan to make improvements to this intersection priority number 1. At the AUMA Convention in Edmonton the newly elected council must meet with the Minister and ensure this matter is addressed before winter.
On another point, I will immediately investigate why the Town has not yet secured a water supply, and will get onto ensuring there is one in place. Enough procrastinating. If we desire to continue to grow and encourage economic development, we need a long term solution to water supply-conservation alone will not suffice.
The reconstruction, or attention to improving that intersection is the responsibility of the Province. However, it is the responsibility and jurisdiction of the Town to have traffic safety reports done and notify the Province if provincial highways are causing safety concerns within the municipality. In this case, the safety issues must be addressed as soon as possible. This matter should be of highest priority to this council until the matter is resolved.
On past councils, I was always able to work well with the Province to ensure that traffic lights were installed at interstections that had become safety concerns within our community. Janis Tarchuk, our MLA worked with us, and I wonder what has happened to that relationship. For example, I was told when mayor that it would be ten years before we had lights on Griffin and Highway 22, and at George Fox Trail and Highway 22, but the council of the day was able to move that forward. It took time, resolve and perserverance! As you all know, I have plenty of all three when it comes to safety to Cochrane citizens.
The Highway 22/Highway 1A intersection does need major redesign to accommodate future growth, however there are some obvious improvements that can be done immediately that may address the ongoing issues. For example, there are no advanced left turn lights. This encourages people turning left coming down the hill or turning onto Highway 1A from Highway 22 to dart through the intersection in front of oncoming traffic. I have seen many close calls. It is also an obvious solution to ensure that people who want to turn right onto Highway 1A from Highway 22 have a dedicated lane to do so. This would allow people turning right to move out of the northbound lane and ease up the line of traffic. Getting through that intersection can take 25 minutes during busy times of day!
The most important thing for the Province to do is to stop people from passing on the right to get around the people who are trying to turn left onto Highway 1A from Highway 22. There is no dedicated lane to allow people to pass northbound traffic on the right, and therefore, that maneouver is actually illegal and dangerous. That is where all the darting happens with near misses where someone may be killed, when people decide they have waited too long to turn into Town when coming down the hill, or to get onto westbound Highway 1A. Some days there are line ups all the way past the Quigley Drive intersection and all the way up the hill past the Sunset Ridge developments coming south. These traffic issues are not going away. The Council must address these matters asap. Someone will be seriously hurt if nothing is done!
When elected, I plan to make improvements to this intersection priority number 1. At the AUMA Convention in Edmonton the newly elected council must meet with the Minister and ensure this matter is addressed before winter.
On another point, I will immediately investigate why the Town has not yet secured a water supply, and will get onto ensuring there is one in place. Enough procrastinating. If we desire to continue to grow and encourage economic development, we need a long term solution to water supply-conservation alone will not suffice.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
On the Campaign Trail
Today was a busy day-after the Mutt Strut, Maggie joined me and we went door to door in Heritage Hills. Many thanks to Maggie, and to all the people who chatted with me and encouraged my campaign.
The issues raised were diverse, but shared by most people in that new subdivision. First, every person who spoke to me was concerned for his or her safety when using the Highway 22 and Highway 1 intersection during rush hours. They also commented on the lack of connectivity with the Town as there is no pathway system that they can follow to get into the core-everyone must have a car.
It was interesting that the citizens said the development is wonderful and they deliberately chose their neighbourhood-they like the diversity of housing options. However, they want the developer to follow through with the amenities that they were promised. They do not want their residential community to become a commercial area. The noise and traffic from construction crews is also a nuisance, but they do understand that this will continue until full build out. I was surprised to hear that construction is allowed on Sundays and that crews start as early as 7:00 am. My understanding is that we do have a bylaw regarding work crew start up and the hours when construction noise is permitted. Here is the link to the Town's Noise Bylaw. Section 4.2 provides that "noise" is not permitted in the night. Night is the period from 10:00 pm to 8:30 am on a weekend.
http://www.cochrane.ca/municipal/toc/webcms.nsf/AllDoc/4D1FA8763B40896E872572A00079B4FE/$File/03-2007%20noise%20control.pdf?OpenElement
After dropping Maggie back home, I went back out on the campaign trial and ended up in West Valley. The issues raised there were the Highway 22 and Highway 1A intersection, and the lack of emergency access at Horse Creek Road. Two different families were excited about the possibility of serving as PALs-public at large representatives- on Town Boards and Committees. This was very refreshing news. As well, I had the opportunity to hear from some folks who want to learn more about sustainability. I will find the link to the town website where PAL positions are posted.
I moved into the Riverview area, and canvassed one neighbourhood before my feet told me to head for home-I think I have walked about 15 km today. No issues were raised, but I reconnected with some great supporters and that was a wonderful way to end the day.
More tomorrow. I'm on a roll....... May go back out after dinner.
The issues raised were diverse, but shared by most people in that new subdivision. First, every person who spoke to me was concerned for his or her safety when using the Highway 22 and Highway 1 intersection during rush hours. They also commented on the lack of connectivity with the Town as there is no pathway system that they can follow to get into the core-everyone must have a car.
It was interesting that the citizens said the development is wonderful and they deliberately chose their neighbourhood-they like the diversity of housing options. However, they want the developer to follow through with the amenities that they were promised. They do not want their residential community to become a commercial area. The noise and traffic from construction crews is also a nuisance, but they do understand that this will continue until full build out. I was surprised to hear that construction is allowed on Sundays and that crews start as early as 7:00 am. My understanding is that we do have a bylaw regarding work crew start up and the hours when construction noise is permitted. Here is the link to the Town's Noise Bylaw. Section 4.2 provides that "noise" is not permitted in the night. Night is the period from 10:00 pm to 8:30 am on a weekend.
http://www.cochrane.ca/municipal/toc/webcms.nsf/AllDoc/4D1FA8763B40896E872572A00079B4FE/$File/03-2007%20noise%20control.pdf?OpenElement
After dropping Maggie back home, I went back out on the campaign trial and ended up in West Valley. The issues raised there were the Highway 22 and Highway 1A intersection, and the lack of emergency access at Horse Creek Road. Two different families were excited about the possibility of serving as PALs-public at large representatives- on Town Boards and Committees. This was very refreshing news. As well, I had the opportunity to hear from some folks who want to learn more about sustainability. I will find the link to the town website where PAL positions are posted.
I moved into the Riverview area, and canvassed one neighbourhood before my feet told me to head for home-I think I have walked about 15 km today. No issues were raised, but I reconnected with some great supporters and that was a wonderful way to end the day.
More tomorrow. I'm on a roll....... May go back out after dinner.
September 11, 2010
Last night I went door to door in east end Cochrane. Two interesting issues were raised:
1. The need for door to door recycling pick up; and
2. Concerns about the location of the so-called east end connector pathway from the Spray Lake Rec Centre to Dewey Blainey Park.
Door to door recycling pick up is currently handled by a private collection company, Cochrane Recyclers for a modest fee. Here is the link to their website:
http://www.cochranerecyclers.com/
I was able to pass on that information as well as let the new citizens who recently moved here know that all people in Cochrane can drop off their recycling at the depot. Here is the link to the town's recycling depot:
http://www.cochrane.ca/municipal/toc/webcms.nsf/AllDoc/E6B2A4C70DB629E3872576FE0075A1F9?OpenDocument
This is an interesting topic that has been discussed many times in the past by different councils. Certainly, it is an issue worth raising again. If recycling were to be picked up by the Town on the same day as garbage is picked up, then instead of every citizen making the trip to the depot, there would be one company dropping materials there. In that case, the depot would be required to sort the materials into bins, which is done right now by citizens when they drop off. On the other hand, think of the fuel emissions and fuel savings to the community if everyone is not driving their recycling to the depot in private vehicles. Which program would provide the most beneficial service to society overall? Would more citizens participate and therefore, remove more product from the waste stream and Calgary's landfill? Would the increase in landfill fees be offset by the increased saleable product?
The east end pathway connector is a plan the current council has to extend a pathway over the CPR tracks across from Carolina Drive. Citizens who live on both sides of Carolina Drive do not want a sidewalk extended from First Street in front of their homes. The reason stated adamantly is because the residents would lose their substantial landscaping, including 20 year old trees, and there simply is not sufficient room to accomodate a sidewalk on an already narrow street. The proposed neighbourhood solution is to run a pathway in the alleyway behind the homes on the east side of Carolina Drive. Other ideas include signage and letting people know that they can walk up that short distance of road and connect to the pathway in Dewey Blainey park. Certainly, that would be the cheapest and would have least impact on the existing neighbourhood, providing a reasonable solution for everyone involved.
A third issue raised was about getting involved in the community association. Many people are aware of the group and work that is going on to sustain the east end community. The citizens who talked to me all thanked Andy Marshall for his dedication to this community.
Overall, I was warmly received and had an opportunity to meet 12 new neighbours who have moved to town in the last year or so.
Today was the Mutt Strut! There were so many people out, with dogs of every breed and size. I want to comment on how much Jack Tennant does for this community, but especially for the Cochrane Humane Society. Jack is truly a sustainability ambassador and community builder.
1. The need for door to door recycling pick up; and
2. Concerns about the location of the so-called east end connector pathway from the Spray Lake Rec Centre to Dewey Blainey Park.
Door to door recycling pick up is currently handled by a private collection company, Cochrane Recyclers for a modest fee. Here is the link to their website:
http://www.cochranerecyclers.com/
I was able to pass on that information as well as let the new citizens who recently moved here know that all people in Cochrane can drop off their recycling at the depot. Here is the link to the town's recycling depot:
http://www.cochrane.ca/municipal/toc/webcms.nsf/AllDoc/E6B2A4C70DB629E3872576FE0075A1F9?OpenDocument
This is an interesting topic that has been discussed many times in the past by different councils. Certainly, it is an issue worth raising again. If recycling were to be picked up by the Town on the same day as garbage is picked up, then instead of every citizen making the trip to the depot, there would be one company dropping materials there. In that case, the depot would be required to sort the materials into bins, which is done right now by citizens when they drop off. On the other hand, think of the fuel emissions and fuel savings to the community if everyone is not driving their recycling to the depot in private vehicles. Which program would provide the most beneficial service to society overall? Would more citizens participate and therefore, remove more product from the waste stream and Calgary's landfill? Would the increase in landfill fees be offset by the increased saleable product?
The east end pathway connector is a plan the current council has to extend a pathway over the CPR tracks across from Carolina Drive. Citizens who live on both sides of Carolina Drive do not want a sidewalk extended from First Street in front of their homes. The reason stated adamantly is because the residents would lose their substantial landscaping, including 20 year old trees, and there simply is not sufficient room to accomodate a sidewalk on an already narrow street. The proposed neighbourhood solution is to run a pathway in the alleyway behind the homes on the east side of Carolina Drive. Other ideas include signage and letting people know that they can walk up that short distance of road and connect to the pathway in Dewey Blainey park. Certainly, that would be the cheapest and would have least impact on the existing neighbourhood, providing a reasonable solution for everyone involved.
A third issue raised was about getting involved in the community association. Many people are aware of the group and work that is going on to sustain the east end community. The citizens who talked to me all thanked Andy Marshall for his dedication to this community.
Overall, I was warmly received and had an opportunity to meet 12 new neighbours who have moved to town in the last year or so.
Today was the Mutt Strut! There were so many people out, with dogs of every breed and size. I want to comment on how much Jack Tennant does for this community, but especially for the Cochrane Humane Society. Jack is truly a sustainability ambassador and community builder.
Friday, September 10, 2010
What is a sustainability ambassador?
Some of you may know by now that I am a "sustainability ambassador" for the Cochrane Sustainability Plan. What that means is that I have committed to implementing the plan and to teaching others about the plan and asking them to make a similar commitment. This plan is a community plan, developed and being implemented by volunteer citizens like you and me. It is about making sure Cochrane will remain a vibrant and prosperous community in all the years to come because of our culture of responsibility and our willingness to collaborate and cooperate to make the Cochrane community the best it can be. This has nothing to do with Town Council, other than Council is a partner and has spearheaded the development of the plan. The Council does not own this plan-you do!
Yesterday, I had the pleasure of meeting with two local businesses to walk them through the plan and request that they become "sustainability champions". Both businesses are already on the 13 pathways to sustainability and are involved in all aspects of implementation-they are already champions. What I discovered in both cases was that they just are not aware of the plan or what it means to them. It was an honour to be able to tell them more and engage these people into what is possible-how they can be identified champions of the process and move Cochrane forward as a sustainable community. I was able to show them how they are already leaders -they are already engaged and that this is about citizenship and having fun-celebrating our successes and learning from our trials. There is no financial commitment required-nothing required except a commitment to the plan!
One of my commitments as an ambassador is to ensure that everyone becomes more aware of how involved they are in citizenship activities and sustaining this community. The Activettes, the people who organize the Footstock, our arts community, the Spray Lakes Rec Centre people, the Humane Society, the organizers of the parade, the Lions, the Rotary, people who naturescape or donate to charities or attend community events, our wonderful volunteers etc. etc.-we have so many people involved at the ground level in community building that it is hard to know where to start.
This is not about environmental citizenship-it is about citizenship in every respect. It is about how we live, work and play in this community, and how we use and share resources, whether those are human resources, economic resources, cultural resources, environmental resources, etc.
The plan itself can be found online at:
http://cochranesustainability.ca/
Please read the plan and if you want to learn more, email me or call me and I will be there with the plan and time to walk you through it-to listen and teach and assure you that your contributions have not gone unnoticed.
Everyone who reads this blog is actively engaged in Pathway 1. Everyone who takes time to read the plan is actively engaged as a Sustainability Citizen-without doing one more thing!
I encourage you to be involved-every day. Start each day knowing you can do better-because, you can!
Yesterday, I had the pleasure of meeting with two local businesses to walk them through the plan and request that they become "sustainability champions". Both businesses are already on the 13 pathways to sustainability and are involved in all aspects of implementation-they are already champions. What I discovered in both cases was that they just are not aware of the plan or what it means to them. It was an honour to be able to tell them more and engage these people into what is possible-how they can be identified champions of the process and move Cochrane forward as a sustainable community. I was able to show them how they are already leaders -they are already engaged and that this is about citizenship and having fun-celebrating our successes and learning from our trials. There is no financial commitment required-nothing required except a commitment to the plan!
One of my commitments as an ambassador is to ensure that everyone becomes more aware of how involved they are in citizenship activities and sustaining this community. The Activettes, the people who organize the Footstock, our arts community, the Spray Lakes Rec Centre people, the Humane Society, the organizers of the parade, the Lions, the Rotary, people who naturescape or donate to charities or attend community events, our wonderful volunteers etc. etc.-we have so many people involved at the ground level in community building that it is hard to know where to start.
This is not about environmental citizenship-it is about citizenship in every respect. It is about how we live, work and play in this community, and how we use and share resources, whether those are human resources, economic resources, cultural resources, environmental resources, etc.
The plan itself can be found online at:
http://cochranesustainability.ca/
Please read the plan and if you want to learn more, email me or call me and I will be there with the plan and time to walk you through it-to listen and teach and assure you that your contributions have not gone unnoticed.
Everyone who reads this blog is actively engaged in Pathway 1. Everyone who takes time to read the plan is actively engaged as a Sustainability Citizen-without doing one more thing!
I encourage you to be involved-every day. Start each day knowing you can do better-because, you can!
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Providing needed facilities and infrastructure
Although this may seem like an obvious commitment, a council must purposefully determine what "services, facilities or other things are necessary or desirable for all or part of the municipality". In fact, providing these services or facilities is one of three purposes of having municipal corporations in place, according to law. This is a core purpose and function of the municipal corporation. These services and facilities are not luxuries, they are deemed necessary to support the quality of life of the citizens who live here.
I have been teased in the past for stressing how crucial this aspect of governance is to sustaining a viable community. People say, everyone knows that! But, at budget time when councillors sit to deliberate about which services and facilities can be provided in the short, medium and long term given revenues and expenses, confusion and angst over what to fund is common. No interest group likes to be told that their pet project is not a council priority. No one likes to be told to wait until a plan is finished or a funding proposal complete. I know I don't.
There are a number of needed services and facilities that I would like to get done in the next three years. Some I would like to start, some to get underway and some to finish. Our staff are already involved in day to day activities to provide us with good community services such as policing, water, garbage collection, etc. The list of services or facilities I would like to see completed is provided below:
To start and finish-short term 1-2 years
Secure water supply for full build out
Highway 22/Highway 1A intersection
Downtown public washrooms
Performing arts centre
Public transit service to Calgary
Lights at Centre Ave and Highway 1A
Seniors centre
Taxation policy
Wetland and riparian land conservation and management implementation plan
Comprehensive bylaw/ bylaw enforcement review
Comprehensive consultant recruitment and RFP process review
Implementation of Cochrane Sustainability Plan
Review statutory plans for consistency with Land Use Framework and regional plans
Revised storm drainage management plans-introduce low impact development/naturescaping/xeriscaping/green roof technology on commercial buildings
Investigate use of geothermal energy in large commercial industrial and multi family or institutional buildings
Volunteer recognition program
Revitalize the area around the Men of Vision statue/build a proper pathway
Get started- 1-3 year project
Pool (with therapy)
Public transit internal
Review of middle managment team/ Sustainability Plan
Implementation of low impact development strategies and technologies
Water conservation review and implement tax incentives/technologies
Review election process and requirements to prove residency
Long term-ongoing
Public consultation process to understand shared community values
Comprehensive riverside natural conservation areas and parks
Integrated water and land conservation and management plans
Cumulative effects management of land base
Improved communication tools and outreach to all sectors
Sometimes studies are required to ensure that projects are needed and can be accomodated within municipal budget. Sometimes studies help council to prioritize which projects can be done quickly and which projects require more sources of income or design considerations. For many of the projects listed above, I think we have had too many studies and too little action over the last ten years. Time to get them done. For example, the idea of public washrooms downtown was suggested every budget year that I served on council, and I understand that this year we may actually get them. This is an item that the downtown business community has asked for every single year.
I would be happy to know what you think are priority services or projects that we need to put in place over the next three years. Your priorities are my priorities.
I have been teased in the past for stressing how crucial this aspect of governance is to sustaining a viable community. People say, everyone knows that! But, at budget time when councillors sit to deliberate about which services and facilities can be provided in the short, medium and long term given revenues and expenses, confusion and angst over what to fund is common. No interest group likes to be told that their pet project is not a council priority. No one likes to be told to wait until a plan is finished or a funding proposal complete. I know I don't.
There are a number of needed services and facilities that I would like to get done in the next three years. Some I would like to start, some to get underway and some to finish. Our staff are already involved in day to day activities to provide us with good community services such as policing, water, garbage collection, etc. The list of services or facilities I would like to see completed is provided below:
To start and finish-short term 1-2 years
Secure water supply for full build out
Highway 22/Highway 1A intersection
Downtown public washrooms
Performing arts centre
Public transit service to Calgary
Lights at Centre Ave and Highway 1A
Seniors centre
Taxation policy
Wetland and riparian land conservation and management implementation plan
Comprehensive bylaw/ bylaw enforcement review
Comprehensive consultant recruitment and RFP process review
Implementation of Cochrane Sustainability Plan
Review statutory plans for consistency with Land Use Framework and regional plans
Revised storm drainage management plans-introduce low impact development/naturescaping/xeriscaping/green roof technology on commercial buildings
Investigate use of geothermal energy in large commercial industrial and multi family or institutional buildings
Volunteer recognition program
Revitalize the area around the Men of Vision statue/build a proper pathway
Get started- 1-3 year project
Pool (with therapy)
Public transit internal
Review of middle managment team/ Sustainability Plan
Implementation of low impact development strategies and technologies
Water conservation review and implement tax incentives/technologies
Review election process and requirements to prove residency
Long term-ongoing
Public consultation process to understand shared community values
Comprehensive riverside natural conservation areas and parks
Integrated water and land conservation and management plans
Cumulative effects management of land base
Improved communication tools and outreach to all sectors
Sometimes studies are required to ensure that projects are needed and can be accomodated within municipal budget. Sometimes studies help council to prioritize which projects can be done quickly and which projects require more sources of income or design considerations. For many of the projects listed above, I think we have had too many studies and too little action over the last ten years. Time to get them done. For example, the idea of public washrooms downtown was suggested every budget year that I served on council, and I understand that this year we may actually get them. This is an item that the downtown business community has asked for every single year.
I would be happy to know what you think are priority services or projects that we need to put in place over the next three years. Your priorities are my priorities.
Monday, September 6, 2010
Upcoming Events
Next Saturday, I will be walking Ace in the Mutt Strut as part of The Animal Oasis Team. This event raises funds for the Cochrane Humane Society, and The Animal Oasis is a great company from Calgary that is participating this year. The strut starts at Mitford Park. You can learn more on the society's website.
Sunday, September 19, I will be volunteering and participating at the Terry Fox Run. I have not missed this event since it started in Cochrane, and I used to be the organizer. The run starts at the Spray Lake Sawmills Rec Centre at 1:00 but there is a registration so come early. I look forward to seeing all my friends there.
Both events enable sponsorship, so that people who want to contribute can donate through my pledge sheet. I am always looking for sponsorship, so let me know.
Tomorrow, when I get back from my Calgary Region Airshed Zone meeting, I will discuss developing facilities and infrastructure and what I am committed to doing if elected. Keep following along with me. Many thanks to all the well-wishers I met today along the Parade Route-that was great!
Sunday, September 19, I will be volunteering and participating at the Terry Fox Run. I have not missed this event since it started in Cochrane, and I used to be the organizer. The run starts at the Spray Lake Sawmills Rec Centre at 1:00 but there is a registration so come early. I look forward to seeing all my friends there.
Both events enable sponsorship, so that people who want to contribute can donate through my pledge sheet. I am always looking for sponsorship, so let me know.
Tomorrow, when I get back from my Calgary Region Airshed Zone meeting, I will discuss developing facilities and infrastructure and what I am committed to doing if elected. Keep following along with me. Many thanks to all the well-wishers I met today along the Parade Route-that was great!
Saturday, September 4, 2010
New Innovative Taxation Policy
Does it ever seem to you that taxes assessed on the "market value" of your home or business property are very strange sources of stable municipal revenue? This system of "property tax revenue" was instituted by the government of Alberta several years ago. Your property taxes collected under this system are not used only for municipal facilities and services, but also for school facilities and services.
Many citizens don't really understand "market value", and I would like to ensure that people who are required to pay property taxes do understand the terminology and reason for property taxes and how they are assessed and levied. This is an important aspect of a new taxation policy for Cochrane. It is not good enough just to provide citizens with a pie chart and a questionnaire at budget time or just before the tax rate is set: the corporation needs to provide educational opportunities for citizens to engage in dialogue and learn more about taxation. Education of citizens is just one, but a crucial, aspect of the taxation policy I propose.
The market value of residential and business property rises and falls over time. Canadians, Albertans and Cochranites are all in a "real estate bubble" wherein market value of our properties may fall in the near future if our economy cannot sustain the high property values we currently enjoy. If our total market value assessment falls in Cochrane, then the tax rate that is applied against the total market value assessment will need to increase to ensure that there are sufficient funds to run the municipal corporation and provide you with all the services and facilities you want and need to sustain your quality of life. The business community is also affected by fluctuating market value assessments and it becomes difficult to predict what tax increases will affect business profit margins each year.
The annual market value assessment is based on what the market value of your property was in June of the preceding year. This year, in June, the property values were relatively stable. However, next June when the new tax rate is applied to that market value assessment, property values may have fallen. The appraised market value is therefore never a true indication of your property's market value in the year it is applied against the tax rate-it reflects the previous year's value. People are confused by this.
I often wonder if Cochrane has explored the many mechanisms available and variety of economic instruments that could be used to ensure stable revenues to achieve council objectives. While user fees have increased substantially lately, few people realize that there have been increases, and fewer still understand why user fees are applied at all. What I hear going door to door is that people want less taxes and less utility rate increases-not more. Mostly, they want to understand why some people pay more taxes than others. People want to understand the difference between a base rate on their water bills and a consumption rate.
Tax incentives are also a good mechanism to achieve Council objectives. Council needs to plan for and explore tax incentives for encouraging citizens to engage in many activities and contribute to development of community programs and facilities. For example, the Cochrane Sustainability Plan provides that "water is our most precious resource" and demonstrates pathways to realize this lofty goal. Council could encourage respectful use of water through tax incentives-we do not need to have sky-rocketing water bills to achieve this stated objective. For example, naturescaping is a perfectly fine alternative to cookie -cutter lawns and gardens that use thirsty ornamentals. If the municiplaity encouraged naturescaping in all new developments, as per the Town Land Use Bylaw, then indigenous plants and materials would be used that require little or no irrigation. As of today, the Town does not even implement its own "landscaping" provisions in the land use bylaw.
I will be coming back to taxation policy over the course of the campaign as people ask me questions and direct my attention to their concerns about taxes. Stay with me over time, and I know you will find taxation policy a needed and innovative concept that might improve how the municipality engages citizens and does better business. Perhaps the most important aspect of the taxation policy I propose is that it be "deliberate", where everything is planned and determined throught collaboration and open public debate and dialogue with interested citizens.
One thing is sure, I will be opposed to any suggestion or agenda item brought forward where councillors or the mayor want a salary increase during the next three year term of office. There is absolutely no justification for a group of candidates to ask you to vote for them, based on what the municipality can afford to provide for councillor services, and then as soon as elected, ask for more money to do the job. The current salaries and job descriptions are posted on the Town's website-those are the salaries that candidates can expect to receive for the services they provide to you as members of council, and if it seems insufficient, then they simply should not apply for the job! Enough is enough!
Many citizens don't really understand "market value", and I would like to ensure that people who are required to pay property taxes do understand the terminology and reason for property taxes and how they are assessed and levied. This is an important aspect of a new taxation policy for Cochrane. It is not good enough just to provide citizens with a pie chart and a questionnaire at budget time or just before the tax rate is set: the corporation needs to provide educational opportunities for citizens to engage in dialogue and learn more about taxation. Education of citizens is just one, but a crucial, aspect of the taxation policy I propose.
The market value of residential and business property rises and falls over time. Canadians, Albertans and Cochranites are all in a "real estate bubble" wherein market value of our properties may fall in the near future if our economy cannot sustain the high property values we currently enjoy. If our total market value assessment falls in Cochrane, then the tax rate that is applied against the total market value assessment will need to increase to ensure that there are sufficient funds to run the municipal corporation and provide you with all the services and facilities you want and need to sustain your quality of life. The business community is also affected by fluctuating market value assessments and it becomes difficult to predict what tax increases will affect business profit margins each year.
The annual market value assessment is based on what the market value of your property was in June of the preceding year. This year, in June, the property values were relatively stable. However, next June when the new tax rate is applied to that market value assessment, property values may have fallen. The appraised market value is therefore never a true indication of your property's market value in the year it is applied against the tax rate-it reflects the previous year's value. People are confused by this.
I often wonder if Cochrane has explored the many mechanisms available and variety of economic instruments that could be used to ensure stable revenues to achieve council objectives. While user fees have increased substantially lately, few people realize that there have been increases, and fewer still understand why user fees are applied at all. What I hear going door to door is that people want less taxes and less utility rate increases-not more. Mostly, they want to understand why some people pay more taxes than others. People want to understand the difference between a base rate on their water bills and a consumption rate.
Tax incentives are also a good mechanism to achieve Council objectives. Council needs to plan for and explore tax incentives for encouraging citizens to engage in many activities and contribute to development of community programs and facilities. For example, the Cochrane Sustainability Plan provides that "water is our most precious resource" and demonstrates pathways to realize this lofty goal. Council could encourage respectful use of water through tax incentives-we do not need to have sky-rocketing water bills to achieve this stated objective. For example, naturescaping is a perfectly fine alternative to cookie -cutter lawns and gardens that use thirsty ornamentals. If the municiplaity encouraged naturescaping in all new developments, as per the Town Land Use Bylaw, then indigenous plants and materials would be used that require little or no irrigation. As of today, the Town does not even implement its own "landscaping" provisions in the land use bylaw.
I will be coming back to taxation policy over the course of the campaign as people ask me questions and direct my attention to their concerns about taxes. Stay with me over time, and I know you will find taxation policy a needed and innovative concept that might improve how the municipality engages citizens and does better business. Perhaps the most important aspect of the taxation policy I propose is that it be "deliberate", where everything is planned and determined throught collaboration and open public debate and dialogue with interested citizens.
One thing is sure, I will be opposed to any suggestion or agenda item brought forward where councillors or the mayor want a salary increase during the next three year term of office. There is absolutely no justification for a group of candidates to ask you to vote for them, based on what the municipality can afford to provide for councillor services, and then as soon as elected, ask for more money to do the job. The current salaries and job descriptions are posted on the Town's website-those are the salaries that candidates can expect to receive for the services they provide to you as members of council, and if it seems insufficient, then they simply should not apply for the job! Enough is enough!
Friday, September 3, 2010
Key Messages
There are five key elements of my campaign platform. I will list the key elements here, and then each one will be explained in detail over the next few days.
There are two umbrella statements that frame my campaign:
1. Cochrane can do better! As my community of choice, it is worth my investment of time and energy to serve on Council.
2. The Cochrane Sustainability Plan needs to be implemented across all sectors of our community. It is not good enough to roll out a community plan that shows how we are dots within Cochrane's urban landscape-Council must provide leadership and demonstrate how the dots are all connected.
The five key elements of my campaignare listed below.
I am committed to and will work to achieve:
1. A new innovative taxation policy;
2. Providing needed facilities and infrastructure;
3. Up front public participation in planning;
4. Research and understanding, staff training and development; and
5. Sustaining community assets for future prosperity.
I am not a rubber stamp. I am an independent thinker, and research extensively before making decisions that may affect the quality of life of people in Cochrane. Your opinions count.
There are two umbrella statements that frame my campaign:
1. Cochrane can do better! As my community of choice, it is worth my investment of time and energy to serve on Council.
2. The Cochrane Sustainability Plan needs to be implemented across all sectors of our community. It is not good enough to roll out a community plan that shows how we are dots within Cochrane's urban landscape-Council must provide leadership and demonstrate how the dots are all connected.
The five key elements of my campaignare listed below.
I am committed to and will work to achieve:
1. A new innovative taxation policy;
2. Providing needed facilities and infrastructure;
3. Up front public participation in planning;
4. Research and understanding, staff training and development; and
5. Sustaining community assets for future prosperity.
I am not a rubber stamp. I am an independent thinker, and research extensively before making decisions that may affect the quality of life of people in Cochrane. Your opinions count.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)